Eighteenth-century "Proper" and
"Correct" English:
William Perry's Descriptions of "True
Pronunciation".
University of Catania
That there is a
difficulty in fixing a standard for
pronunciation, is evident from what follows. The literati, who make etymology the invariable rule of pronunciation,
often pronounce words in such a manner, as to bring upon themselves the charge
of affectation and pedantry; and though custom, in a great measure, is the rule
of present practice, we should by no means follow the daily alterations
introduced by caprice: In particular cases, however, it is necessary they
should mutually give way to each other.
Mere men of the
world, notwithstanding all their politeness, often retain so much of their
provincial dialect, or commit such gross errours in speaking and writing, as to
exclude them from the honour of being the standard of accurate pronunciation.
Those who unite these two characters, and with correctness and precision of
true learning combine the ease and elegance of genteel life, may justly be
styled the only true standard for propriety of speech.
(William Perry, 1793: ii)
The aim of my paper is to trace a
description of spoken English standardisation in the eighteenth century.
William Perry's Dictionary proposed
norms and rules for a "correct" pronunciation of standard English,
being perfectly in line with the language guardians of the time who, as Blake
(1996: 237) put it, were busy to fashion "what was right and set the
standard", supporting the "polite language" ideology (see Watts
2002, see also MacMahon 1998).
One of the most
famous lexicographers of his time, with his dictionary Perry gave an
outstanding contribution to the prescription of spoken Standard English and to
"the eighteenth century preference for a linguistic usage which was at
once fixed and immutable" (Jones 1995: 1) and at same time, as Watts puts
it (2002: 158, see also Watts 1999), setting the tone "for social climbers
wishing to acquire those attributes of polite society that were enshrined
within forms of language". In fact, Perry's intentions to fix a standard
based on the concept of 'politeness' are first revealed in the dedicatory
letter addressed to Lord Robert Manners when he states that:
The following dictionary intended to fix a standard for the
pronunciation of the English Language, conformable to the present practice of
polite speakers in the city of London
and later in the Preface:
It is from the practice of men of letters, eminent orators, and polite
speakers in the Metropoli, that I have deduced the criterion of the following work, on the merit of which
the learned part of mankind are capable of determining for themselves (1793:
iii).
To conclude, although Perry shares a few
characteristics with Sheridan and Buchanan, as he himself maintains in the
Preface, he also reveals a certain dissatisfaction with the way "the sounds of words are expressed" (1793:
iii) by the other two eighteenth-century scholars. Therefore, my paper will
examine the "more rational method" (Ibid.) proposed in his attempt to
better represent the sounds of the English language.
Bibliography:
Primary Sources:
Perry, W., 17938, The Royal Standard English Dictionary, (1775), Edinburgh,
Bell&Bradfute.
Secondary Sources:
Blake, N. F., 1996, A History of the English Language, London, Macmillan;
Dobson, E. J., 1957, English Pronunciation 1500-1700, 2 vols., Oxford, Clarendon Press;
Fennell B. A., 2001, A History of English. A Sociolinguistic Approach, Oxford,
Blackwell;
Finegan, E., 1998, "English Grammar and
Usage" in S. Romaine (ed.), The
Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV 1776-1997, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, pp. 536-588;
Fitzmaurice, S., 2000, "The Spectator, The Politics of Social Networks, and Language
Standardisation in Eighteenth Century England", in L. Wright (ed.), The Development of Standard English
1300-1800, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 195-218;
Görlach, M., 1999, "Regional and Social
Variation" in R. Lass (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English
Language: 1476-1776, Volume III, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
459-538;
Jones, C., 1989, A
History of English Phonology, London and New York, Longman;
Jones, C., 1995, "Sources for Scots Pronunciation
in the Eighteenth Century", Paradigm,
17, Sept. 1-19, URL http://w4.ed.uiuc.edu/faculty/westbury/Paradigm/jones.html
[30 August 2002];
MacMahon, 1998, M. K. C., "Phonology" in S.
Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge History of
the English Language, Vol. IV 1776-1997, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, pp. 373-535;
Millar, S., 2002, "Eloquence and Elegance. Ideals
of Communicative in Spoken English" in R. Watts and P. Trudgill (eds.), Alternative Histories of English, London
and New York, Routledge, pp. 155-172;
Milroy, J. and L. Milroy, 19912, Authority in Language. Investigating
Language Prescription and Standardisation, London and New York, Routledge;
Strang, B. M. H. 1970, A History of English, London, Methuen;
Watts, R. J., 1999, "The Social Construction of
Standard English: Grammar Writers as a 'Discourse Community' in T. Bex and R.
J. Watts (eds.), Standard English: The
Widening Debate, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 40-68;
Watts, R., 2002, "From Polite Language to
Educated Language" in R. Watts and P. Trudgill (eds.), Alternative Histories of English, London
and New York, Routledge, pp. 155-172.